Talk:WeaponX

Content Allocation Issues

Should we split IFV, ChargeTurret, and Gattling onto separate pages corresponding to their respective system activation flags? In ModEnc convention, we typically explain individual flags first, then use a "See Also" section at the bottom to link to dedicated pages. We could retain flags like DeployFireWeapon and NoAmmoWeapon - these flags can function when any of the three flags activate the WeaponX system. For instance:

When enabling WeaponX system through single-stage Gattling configuration, in addition to Primary/Secondary Weapon1/2, these flags that can bypass WeaponStages limitations allow invoking other WeaponX instances. This enables units to utilize nine(and more) different weapons according to ForceWeapon rules.

We can further discuss whether components with their own systems should be moved to the pages of their activation flags or to tutorial pages like IFV_Weapon_System. Currently, the IsGattling flag implementation follows the former approach but has not been relocated under the "See Also" section.

- DeathFish (SysOs) (talk｜contribs) 20:40, 6 April 2025 (CEST)