Trainable: Difference between revisions
en>TAK02 People REALLY should've chkd the code for promoted units BEFORE typing anything here |
en>TAK02 READ. THE. COMMENTS. BEFORE. TYPING. ANYTHING. HERE. |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|files={{Categ|Rules(md).ini}} | |files={{Categ|Rules(md).ini}} | ||
|values=boolean | |values=boolean | ||
|default= | |default=yes | ||
|types={{Categ|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ|BuildingTypes}} | |types={{Categ|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ|BuildingTypes}} | ||
|ts=yes | |ts=yes | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted. | Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted. | ||
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus because said objects | It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), and the default is 'yes', not 'no'. | ||
Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and the Westwood's comment regarding this flag. | |||
Revision as of 13:54, 23 July 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flag: | Trainable |
| File(s): | Rules(md).ini |
| Values: | boolean |
| Default: | yes |
| Applicable to: | InfantryTypes, VehicleTypes, AircraftTypes, BuildingTypes |
Specifies whether this object is subject to the Veterancy System and can thus be promoted.
It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy crate bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have Trainable=no even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), and the default is 'yes', not 'no'. Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and the Westwood's comment regarding this flag.