Trainable - Revision history

MarkJFox: 11 revisions imported

2025-03-31T20:09:57Z

11 revisions imported

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:09, 31 March 2025
(No difference)

en>Testid123 at 15:16, 19 September 2024

2024-09-19T15:16:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 19 September 2024
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.		Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.

	It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure.		It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure.<br>
			<center><h3>Exceptions to <b>"Trainable=no"</b></h3></center><br>1.[[InfantryTypes]], [[VehicleTypes]] Get the result of the {{f\|InitialVeteran\|yes\|link}} tag.

			2.[[InfantryTypes]] enters [[BuildingTypes]] that is using tags {{f\|Armory\|yes\|link}}

			3.[[VehicleTypes]] gets the result of the tag. [[DeploysInto]]

			4.[[InfantryTypes]], [[VehicleTypes]] Promoted from introducing SPY into [[Factory]] of the enemy

en>TAK02: No BuildingType has Trainable=no yet they still aren't promoted. Other Types if they don't have Trainable=no are promoted.

2020-12-24T12:11:57Z

No BuildingType has Trainable=no yet they still aren't promoted. Other Types if they don't have Trainable=no are promoted.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:11, 24 December 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|files={{Categ\|Rules(md).ini}}		\|files={{Categ\|Rules(md).ini}}
	\|values=boolean		\|values=boolean
	\|default=yes		\|default=yes for {{Categ\|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ\|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ\|AircraftTypes}}; no for {{Categ\|BuildingTypes}}
	\|types={{Categ\|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ\|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ\|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ\|BuildingTypes}}		\|types={{Categ\|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ\|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ\|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ\|BuildingTypes}}
	\|ts=yes		\|ts=yes
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted.		Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted.

	It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes', not 'no'.		It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes' for {{Categ\|VehicleTypes}}, not 'no'.
	Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.		Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.

	It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure.		It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure.

en>VladisS at 23:35, 5 June 2018

2018-06-05T23:35:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 6 June 2018
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.		Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.

	It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in structure.		It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in occupied structure.

en>VladisS at 23:34, 5 June 2018

2018-06-05T23:34:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:34, 6 June 2018
Line 17:		Line 17:
	It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes', not 'no'.		It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes', not 'no'.
	Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.		Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.

			It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is infantry in structure.

en>TAK02: Minor corrections

2017-07-29T15:36:00Z

Minor corrections

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:36, 29 July 2017
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted.		Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted.

	It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), ~~and~~ the default is 'yes', not 'no'.		It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), as the default is 'yes', not 'no'.
	Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and ~~the~~ Westwood's comment regarding this flag.		Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and Westwood's comment regarding this flag.

en>TAK02: READ. THE. COMMENTS. BEFORE. TYPING. ANYTHING. HERE.

2017-07-23T11:54:03Z

READ. THE. COMMENTS. BEFORE. TYPING. ANYTHING. HERE.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:54, 23 July 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|files={{Categ\|Rules(md).ini}}		\|files={{Categ\|Rules(md).ini}}
	\|values=boolean		\|values=boolean
	\|default=no		\|default=yes
	\|types={{Categ\|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ\|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ\|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ\|BuildingTypes}}		\|types={{Categ\|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ\|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ\|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ\|BuildingTypes}}
	\|ts=yes		\|ts=yes
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted.		Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted.

	It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus because said objects ~~had~~ Trainable=~~yes~~ even though they ~~shouldn't~~ have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])).		It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus. However, this is because said objects did, in fact, NOT have [[Trainable=no]] even though they should have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])), and the default is 'yes', not 'no'.
			Evidence can be found both with the incident of promoted excavators and the Westwood's comment regarding this flag.

en>TAK02: People REALLY should've chkd the code for promoted units BEFORE typing anything here

2017-07-07T15:53:39Z

People REALLY should've chkd the code for promoted units BEFORE typing anything here

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 7 July 2017
Line 13:		Line 13:
	}}		}}

	Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and thus ~~can~~ be promoted.		Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and can thus be promoted.

	~~Does not~~ seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus.		It is believed that it doesn't seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus because said objects had Trainable=yes even though they shouldn't have it (such as the 'Construction Excavator' ([CONA])).

en>Nighthawk200: Confirmed. I've had veteran Engineers and Dogs as a result of this before.

2009-03-07T21:56:51Z

Confirmed. I've had veteran Engineers and Dogs as a result of this before.

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 7 March 2009
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and thus can be promoted.		Specifies whether this object is subject to the [[Veterancy System]] and thus can be promoted.

	~~{{NeedTesting}}~~
	Does not seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus.		Does not seem to prevent the object from receiving a promotion if it is in range of a veterancy [[crate]] bonus.

en>Nighthawk200: Template Updated

2007-04-04T22:31:07Z

Template Updated

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 5 April 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|files={{Categ\|Rules(md).ini}}		\|files={{Categ\|Rules(md).ini}}
	\|values=boolean		\|values=boolean
	~~\|special=none~~
	\|default=no		\|default=no
	\|types={{Categ\|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ\|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ\|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ\|BuildingTypes}}		\|types={{Categ\|InfantryTypes}}, {{Categ\|VehicleTypes}}, {{Categ\|AircraftTypes}}, {{Categ\|BuildingTypes}}
	\|~~games~~=~~[[TS]], [[RA2]], [[YR]]~~		\|ts=yes
			\|fs=yes
			\|ets=yes
			\|ra2=yes
			\|yr=yes
			\|rp=yes
	}}		}}